|
Since moving into the city, I am having
an easier time getting to the the museum shows in New York; and recently
I carved out a morning to see the Mondrian exhibit at the Museum of Modern
Art. The heralded Mondrian exhibit was indeed comprehensive and gave us
a rare opportunity to glimpse into the whole of Mondrian's career, from
his early drawings and watercolors (which, by the way, are remarkable
technical masterpieces in themselves) to his late grid-filled abstractions
of the city streets. Growing up in a strict Calvinist home, his early
works attest to his inner search for freedom from the rigid religiosity
of his parents. In fact, his early watercolors and drawings anticipated
his embracing of theosophy, a pantheistic amalgamation of Christianity
and eastern religions; the trees filled with spiritual yearning and mystery
as well as the dark, ominous glow of amaryllis so impeccably rendered
and deeply felt.
His late works became more and more rigid, mirroring, I think, the rigidity
of his parentsŐ religious outlook. He countered the confusion and chaos
of life in a war-torn world with solidity and clearly defined colors.
And by doing so, he had to revert to the foundation of the solid vertical
and horizontal lines that his early drawings and watercolors fought against.
Consciously or unconsciously, he embraced the structural representation
of his earlier upbringing (although most likely did not embrace faith
in Christ). By doing so his works ground the language of vertical and
horizontal right into the vertigo of modernity and the nebulous cloud
of surrealism. We cannot possibly ignore his influence today, just as
he was not able to escape the influence of the religion of his parents.
I pondered all of this as I walked through the halls of the museum, and
into the permanent collections section of photography. In between the
Avedons and Mapplethorpes something caught my attention.
US Navy A Burning Japanese Dive Bomber Shot Down by Anti-Aircraft Fire
From a Navy Carrier 1944-1945. Gelatin-silver print.
It was a photograph of the Kamikaze Bomber, drawing an arc toward the
ocean with its flame and smoke. The arc was so perfect and nearly complete.
The anonymous navy photographer caught the plane at a millisecond before
it hit the ocean. Beyond the plane was another Navy carrier, its silhouette
ominously looming on the horizon. In the foreground corner was the Navy
carrier on which the photographer stood, its plane with folded wings a
shiny black shadow. The photogragh was flawless in composition, perfectly
executed and planned. I can just see the photographer taking shot after
shot (as his comrades literally took shots with artillery). I'm sure that
when he took this one, he knew he had something.
It captures the moment of death of an individual pilot, and yet it captures
in a single photo the essence of a momentous war between nations. The
photo stands as a momentary reflection in the rushing torrent of time,
and freezes the urgency of the moment. For me, being a Japanese-American,
it felt like the drama was taking place within my heart. This was photography
at it's best; a marriage of technology and art , poignantly capturing
a piece of the historical. Both form (technology) and content (war) were
perfectly fused and expressed. While Mondrian sought to escape this horror
in finding refuge in his grid and colors, this photographer served the
moment by confronting horror with precision and artfulness. Did the photographer
know his work would even survive? Did he survive the war? Both Mondrian
and the anonymous photographer were witnesses of war's horror; how they
reacted to their circumstances was strongly reflected in their art. They
both responded to a historical reality, and represent to me two different
approaches; an approach of immanence and an approach of transcendence
to capture reality. Great art always deals with both the transcendence
and immanence, both heaven and earth.
The photograph represents to me one response to significant events in
history-- an approach of immanence. He actively participated , going there
and observing, and capturing the events in a photo. This photo, though,
at the same time, transcends the moment, making it memorable. Mondrian
represents the other-- a transcendental approach. He analyzed history
philosophically, objectively and passively, and sought to express his
utopian vision. What succeeds in his work is that the transcendent, utopian
vision did not remain in heaven but landed on earth, with grids and colors
creating a delightful patina.
And yet, today, Mondrian's works are full of cracks. The paint is too
much of earth to fully contain the utopian vision. We create works striving
for heaven, but ultimately the earth wins. And if that is true in our
works, how much more is it true in our lives? How many of us live and
strive for the transcendent in our lives but find ourselves trapped in
the immanent? Our circumstances prevent us from experiencing the freedom
that we long for. We fall in love but then our relationships fail us,
leaving us at last disillusioned. We create masterpieces but we fall far
away from being masterpieces ourselves. Are our dreams and ideals simply
an escape from reality, or are they our connection to the greater reality?
Are we earthbound, or heavenbound?
As we celebrate Easter this month, we need to remind ourselves that Christ's
resurrection represents a fusion of greater power and significance than
the atomic bomb. This fusion recreated the transcendent and the immanent,
heaven and earth. Christ rose not as a ghost but as a supernatural creation
of another dimensional plane. Christ possessed the immanent power of cooking
and eating food with his disciples. But he also possessed the transcendent
power of walking in and out a locked room at will (see John 20 and 21).
He is the Creator of a new order and dimension, and he will restore all
things under this new greater reality. By trusting and building our lives
on this reality of Christ, we can be heavenbound.
And therefore this single, historic event is the key to understanding
our lives and art. This is the only source of hope that heaven will triumph
over the earth. Christ is the only one who can heal the schism between
the transcendent reality of who you are made for and what your works strive
towards, and the immanent, material reality of who you are and what your
works actually are. No other religion dares to go this far in claiming
so much; substantiated by a historical event, it shatters even what we
can imagine a religion to be. Christ appeared in a new body that penetrates
and redefines the old. If, as has been said by many artists, death is
the most powerful content for art, then the resurrection gives us a revolutionary
new context by which we can create and live.
The anonymous photographer captured a significant reality of a war that
reflects the schism within us. Perhaps in the Japanese bomber being shot
down we see so much of ourselves being shot down by the cruel reality
of this life as we reach for the stars. The bomber pilot thought that
his purpose in life was to sacrifice his life for the god of the rising
sun--the emperor of Japan. Easter tells us that we are built for so much
more than dying for a mortal man. We are built to live to glorify our
Creator. We are built to serve him and, yes, die for him, because he is
the only one for whom we can die and find true life. He is the one who
said , "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me,
though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me
shall never die. Do you believe this?"(John 11:25-26)
-Makoto Fujimura |